Is Holy Supper accdg. to Bro. Eli's teaching is not literal.

Go down

Is Holy Supper accdg. to Bro. Eli's teaching is not literal.

Post by eaglefighter on 2008-06-10, 16:19

All Christian denominations including Manalism conduct their Holy Supper of the Lord in a literal way where a cup of wine, a cracker and a host is shown while conducting it.

but accdg. to Bro. Eli, this is not biblical because Holy Supper is spiritual where bread is the Gospel and not a host or a cracker and the cup of wine is not a literal cup of wine but a cup of suffering.

Does Bro. Eli said is true or just inventing his own teachings that came from his mind?
avatar
eaglefighter
Newbie
Newbie

Male Number of posts : 17
Age : 31
Location : computer table and computer monitor.
Believer or Not? : Roman Catholic Church
Site: : http://profiles.friendster.com/allyofadd007
Registration date : 2008-06-07

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Is Holy Supper accdg. to Bro. Eli's teaching is not literal.

Post by Isaac on 2008-06-12, 14:04

What is your proof that ALL Christian denominations conduct Holy Supper in a literal way?

Assuming that it is literal, those denominations conducting must:
1. Do it during the first day of the feast of unleavened bread.
2. Have the literal bread broken by Christ himself.
3. ALL be eating the same [literal] bread, by implication from I Corinthians 11:21.
4. ALL be drinking in that same [literal] cup.
5. Considerations should be made before eating the bread and drinking in the cup. If he thinks that he is not worthy, he should not take it, as per I Corinthians 11:27-29.
avatar
Isaac
Newbie
Newbie

Male Number of posts : 20
Age : 31
Believer or Not? : Ang Dating Daan (MCGI)
Site: :
Registration date : 2008-05-26

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Back to top

- Similar topics

 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum