Is Holy Supper accdg. to Bro. Eli's teaching is not literal.

View previous topic View next topic Go down

Is Holy Supper accdg. to Bro. Eli's teaching is not literal.

Post by eaglefighter on 2008-06-10, 16:19

All Christian denominations including Manalism conduct their Holy Supper of the Lord in a literal way where a cup of wine, a cracker and a host is shown while conducting it.

but accdg. to Bro. Eli, this is not biblical because Holy Supper is spiritual where bread is the Gospel and not a host or a cracker and the cup of wine is not a literal cup of wine but a cup of suffering.

Does Bro. Eli said is true or just inventing his own teachings that came from his mind?
avatar
eaglefighter
Newbie
Newbie

Male Number of posts : 17
Age : 30
Location : computer table and computer monitor.
Believer or Not? : Roman Catholic Church
Site: : http://profiles.friendster.com/allyofadd007
Registration date : 2008-06-07

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Is Holy Supper accdg. to Bro. Eli's teaching is not literal.

Post by Isaac on 2008-06-12, 14:04

What is your proof that ALL Christian denominations conduct Holy Supper in a literal way?

Assuming that it is literal, those denominations conducting must:
1. Do it during the first day of the feast of unleavened bread.
2. Have the literal bread broken by Christ himself.
3. ALL be eating the same [literal] bread, by implication from I Corinthians 11:21.
4. ALL be drinking in that same [literal] cup.
5. Considerations should be made before eating the bread and drinking in the cup. If he thinks that he is not worthy, he should not take it, as per I Corinthians 11:27-29.
avatar
Isaac
Newbie
Newbie

Male Number of posts : 20
Age : 30
Believer or Not? : Ang Dating Daan (MCGI)
Site: :
Registration date : 2008-05-26

View user profile

Back to top Go down

View previous topic View next topic Back to top

- Similar topics

 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum